You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Características epidemiológicas da violência contra a mulher no Distrito Federal, 2009 a 2012
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.5123/s1679-49742016000200012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lídia Ester Lopes da Silva, Maria Liz Cunha de Oliveira |
| Abstract |
to describe the epidemiological characteristics of cases of violence against women reported in the Federal District, Brazil, 2009-2012. this was a descriptive study of cases of violence against women aged 18- 59 registered on the National Notifiable Diseases System (Sinan). 1,924 cases of violence against women were registered, the perpetrators of which were identified as unknown (25.7%) or spouses (19.0%) of the victims; violence mainly occurred against women of brown skin color (25.0%) and in the domestic environment (38.5%); regarding violence type, physical violence (46.8%) by force (48.0%) stood out, whereby the genitals (15.7%) and the head (12.9%) were the most affected regions. physical violence in domestic environments by unknown aggressors was the main type of violence among the reported cases; shortcomings were identified in recording reported cases, showing the need to improve system quality and train health workers involved. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 67% |
| Brazil | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 19% |
| Psychology | 8 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,633,301
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#48
of 414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,535
of 354,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 414 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.