↓ Skip to main content

Condições de vida e saúde de idosos: resultados do estudo de coorte EpiFloripa Idoso

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Condições de vida e saúde de idosos: resultados do estudo de coorte EpiFloripa Idoso
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, March 2017
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742017000200008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susana Cararo Confortin, Ione Jayce Ceola Schneider, Danielle Ledur Antes, Francieli Cembranel, Lariane Mortean Ono, Larissa Pruner Marques, Lucélia Justino Borges, Rodrigo de Rosso Krug, Eleonora d’Orsi, Susana Cararo Confortin, Ione Jayce Ceola Schneider, Danielle Ledur Antes, Francieli Cembranel, Lariane Mortean Ono, Larissa Pruner Marques, Lucélia Justino Borges, Rodrigo de Rosso Krug, Eleonora d’Orsi

Abstract

to identify sociodemographic, behavioral and health changes in a follow-up of participants in the health survey EpiFloripa Idoso. this is a population-based longitudinal study with elderly individuals in Florianópolis-SC, Brazil. 1,702 elderly individuals were interviewed in 2009-2010 and 1,197 in 2013-2014 (response rate: 89.1% and 70.2%, respectively); among followed-up individuals, most of them remained with a partner (53.4%), living with other people (76.0%), not working (78.0%), with positive health perception (44.0%), not using the Internet (67.5%), not smoking (57.5%), not consuming alcohol (53.3%), not physically active (56.3%), consuming <5 servings of fruits/vegetables (57.3%), independent (60.5%), overweight (47.0%), with negative screening for cognitive impairment (69.4%), with no depressive symptoms (72.0%) and not having suffered falls (60.6%). most elderly did not show significant changes in their sociodemographic, behavioral and health characteristics; the need to rethink more effective actions to improve the elderly health stands out.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 21%
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 35 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 26 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Sports and Recreations 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 35 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2017.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#246
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,052
of 324,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.