You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Vigilância do óbito infantil no Recife, Pernambuco: operacionalização, potencialidades e limites
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.5123/s1679-49742017000200019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Conceição Maria de Oliveira, Cristine Vieira do Bonfim, Maria José Bezerra Guimarães, Paulo Germano Frias, Verônica Cristina Sposito Antonino, Zulma Maria Medeiros, Conceição Maria de Oliveira, Cristine Vieira do Bonfim, Maria José Bezerra Guimarães, Paulo Germano Frias, Verônica Cristina Sposito Antonino, Zulma Maria Medeiros |
| Abstract |
to report the experience on infant mortality surveillance (IMS) in the municipality of Recife-PE, Brazil. a documentary research and a query with key-informants who participated in the implementation and consolidation of the IMS were conducted; data of the Mortality Information System (SIM) and of the surveillance worksheets were used to measure the coverage of the investigated deaths. the implementation of the IMS has occurred gradually since 2003; the strategy is composed by (i) identification of deaths, (ii) investigation, (iii) discussion, (iv) recommendations and correction of vital statistics; upon completion of implementation (2006), 98.5% (256) of the deaths had been investigated and discussed, with the participation of those involved in the cases; in 2015, this coverage corresponded to 97.7%. the main recommendations consisted of expanding the access, coverage and improvement of primary, secondary and tertiary care quality; IMS is able to support changes in health care practices, as well as planning and organization of maternal and child care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2017.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#200
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,122
of 324,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.