You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dengue em gestantes: caracterização dos casos no Brasil, 2007-2015
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.5123/s1679-49742017000300002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Branquinho do Nascimento, Cláudio Morais Siqueira, Giovanini Evelim Coelho, João Bosco Siqueira, Laura Branquinho do Nascimento, Cláudio Morais Siqueira, Giovanini Evelim Coelho, João Bosco Siqueira |
| Abstract |
to characterize the probable cases of dengue in pregnant women reported in Brazil, from 2007 to 2015. descriptive study of sociodemographic, epidemiological, clinical and laboratory characteristics, with data from the Information System for Notifiable Diseases (Sinan). the annual incidence of dengue in pregnant women ranged from 3.3 (2009) to 816.6 (2010) cases per 100 thousand live births; of the 43,772 probable cases of dengue in pregnant women, 81.6% were investigated, 34.1% were confirmed by laboratory tests, and 1.7% were severe cases; hospitalization and fatality rates were of 5.4% and 1.6‰, respectively; the risk of death due to dengue was higher in pregnant women than in the population of non-pregnant women at reproductive age (ratio=3.95; 95%CI=3.07;5.08), and higher in the third trimester of pregnancy (ratio=8.55; 95%CI=6.08;12.02). the results show the burden of dengue in pregnant women and their vulnerability to worsening of the disease and death. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 39 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 47 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,208,166
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#97
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,656
of 326,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.