↓ Skip to main content

Perfil farmacoterapêutico dos usuários e gasto com medicamentos de alto custo em São Leopoldo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, 2014

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perfil farmacoterapêutico dos usuários e gasto com medicamentos de alto custo em São Leopoldo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, 2014
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, November 2017
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742017000400008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariani Sopelsa, Fabiane Raquel Motter, Nêmora Tregnago Barcellos, Heloísa Marquardt Leite, Vera Maria Vieira Paniz, Mariani Sopelsa, Fabiane Raquel Motter, Nêmora Tregnago Barcellos, Heloísa Marquardt Leite, Vera Maria Vieira Paniz

Abstract

to describe the pharmacotherapeutic profile of users of the Specialized Program for Pharmaceutical Assistance, and to measure the expenditure on the most prevalent and the most expensive medications. descriptive study conducted in São Leopoldo-RS, Brazil, with secondary data regarding information about requests accepted in 2014, through administrative proceedings; delivery notes of the State Health Department/RS were used to assess the costs. 1,528 users were included in the study, mostly women (56.7%), and the average age was 52 years (standard deviation=17.9); the most frequent diagnoses were allergic asthma (17.1%), chronic kidney disease (11.5%) and rheumatoid arthritis (8.4%); the most prevalent drug was budesonide+formoterol fumarate (18.3%); among the most prevalent drugs, the highest total monthly expense was with epoetin alfa (BRL37,922.34) and among the most expensive drugs, infliximab (BRL72,503.28). the data show the importance of the Specialized Program for Pharmaceutical Assistance in the high-cost treatment of highly prevalent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#246
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,688
of 340,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.