↓ Skip to main content

Concordância da causa básica e da evitabilidade dos óbitos infantis antes e após a investigação no Recife, Pernambuco, 2014*

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 411)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Concordância da causa básica e da evitabilidade dos óbitos infantis antes e após a investigação no Recife, Pernambuco, 2014*
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, March 2018
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742018000100007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lays Janaina Prazeres Marques, Dayane da Rocha Pimentel, Conceição Maria de Oliveira, Mirella Bezerra Rodrigues Vilela, Paulo Germano Frias, Cristine Vieira do Bonfim

Abstract

to assess the agreement and describe the causes and preventability of infant deaths before and after the investigation. investigation files and death certificates of infants under one year, of mothers living in Recife, Brazil, in 2014 were used; the Cohen kappa index was adopted for agreement analysis of the underlying causes of death; the list of preventable causes of deaths by interventions of the Brazilian National Health System was also adopted. 183 infant deaths were analyzed, of which 117 (63.9%) had the underlying cause revised; before the investigation, 170 (92.2%) deaths were considered preventable, and after investigation, 178 (97.3%); there was reasonable agreement (0.338) regarding the underlying causes of death, and moderate (0.439) for preventability. infant mortality surveillance enabled the improvement of vital events information, contributing to the progress in the specification of underlying causes of death and in the preventability of infant death.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 24%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,549,873
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#44
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,606
of 344,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.