You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cobertura, completude e confiabilidade das informações do Sistema de Informações sobre Nascidos Vivos de maternidades da rede pública no município de São Paulo, 2011*
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.5123/s1679-49742018000100011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eliana de Aquino Bonilha, Eneida Sanches Ramos Vico, Marina de Freitas, Denise Machado Barbuscia, Tatiana Gabriela Brassea Galleguillos, Mirna Namie Okamura, Patrícia Carla dos Santos, Margarida Maria Tenório de Azevedo Lira, Maria Regina Torloni |
| Abstract |
to assess the coverage, completeness and reliability of data on live births in public maternity wards in São Paulo, Brazil. data recorded in the Information System on Live Births (Sinasc) were compared with data collected in a field study (gold standard) during three months in 2011 in four maternity wards in hospital from the SUS network; kappa coefficient was calculated to assess agreement. 5,785 birth records were analyzed; Sinasc coverage was 99.8% and completeness was 96.2%; kappa values showed excellent and good agreement for maternal age (0.99), type of pregnancy, sex and newborn sex and birth weight (0.98), type of delivery (0.97), 1 minute (0.96) and 5th (0.95) minutes, previous live births (0.87) and education level (0.62); regular agreement for prenatal care visits (0.60) and gestational age (0.56); and weak agreement for previous stillbirths (0.09). in the assessed hospitals, Sinasc presented high coverage, completeness and reliability. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Researcher | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,782,070
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#105
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,367
of 344,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.