↓ Skip to main content

Indices para obras de referencia: el caso de la Bibliografía Filatélica Brasileña (BIFIBRA)

Overview of attention for article published in Biblios, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 121)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Indices para obras de referencia: el caso de la Bibliografía Filatélica Brasileña (BIFIBRA)
Published in
Biblios, July 2018
DOI 10.5195/biblios.2018.394
Authors

Diego Andres Salcedo, Kézia de Lira Feitosa

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Biblios
#42
of 121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,513
of 339,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biblios
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.