↓ Skip to main content

Prevalência de deficiências motoras e sua relação com o gasto federal com próteses, órteses e outros equipamentos nos estados brasileiros em 2010

Overview of attention for article published in Fisioterapia e Pesquisa, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalência de deficiências motoras e sua relação com o gasto federal com próteses, órteses e outros equipamentos nos estados brasileiros em 2010
Published in
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa, September 2015
DOI 10.590/1809-2950/13594222032015
Authors

Shamyr Sulyvan Castro, Peterson Marco O. Andrade, John Stone

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
#55
of 96 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,474
of 276,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them