You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Polímero hidrorretentor e fertilização mineral na implantação de híbrido de Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ciência Florestal, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.5902/1980509834950 |
Authors |
Carlos Eduardo Siqueira Teixeira, Anatoly Queiroz Abreu Torres, Erick Martins Nieri, Lucas Amaral de Melo, Lucas Vieira dos Santos, Soraya Alvarenga Botelho |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 50% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,839,027
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Florestal
#1
of 41 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,022
of 361,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Florestal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one scored the same or higher as 40 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them