You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ureia como fonte de nitrogênio na fisiologia e crescimento inicial de <i>Guazuma ulmifolia</i> Lam. (Malvaceae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência Florestal, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.5902/1980509842643 |
| Authors |
Patrícia Oliveira da Silva, Leandro Carlos, Andreia Mendes da Costa, Jorciane Souza Dias, Vitor Martins Veneziano, Carlos Ribeiro Rodrigues |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 67% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 33% |
| Engineering | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,839,541
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Florestal
#1
of 41 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,504
of 518,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Florestal
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one scored the same or higher as 40 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them