↓ Skip to main content

Optical coherence tomography of macular atrophy associated with microcephaly and presumed intrauterine Zika virus infection

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optical coherence tomography of macular atrophy associated with microcephaly and presumed intrauterine Zika virus infection
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, January 2016
DOI 10.5935/0004-2749.20160112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adriana Gondim de Moura Campos, Rodrigo Pessoa Cavalcanti Lira, Tiago Eugenio Faria e Arantes

Abstract

This case report describes the retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings in a microcephalic infant with macular atrophy presumably caused by intrauterine Zika virus infection. OCT demonstrated atrophy of the outer retinal layers and choriocapillaris, including the outer nuclear layer and ellipsoid zone, associated with retinal pigment epithelium hyper-reflectivity and increased OCT penetration into deeper layers of the choroid and sclera. A major concern associated with this infection is the apparent increased incidence of microcephaly in fetuses born to mothers infected with the Zika virus. It is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore the upsurge in congenital microcephaly observed in Brazil. Recently, ocular findings in infants with microcephaly associated with intrauterine Zika virus infection have been described. This is the first report of OCT imaging of macular atrophy in a child with presumed Zika virus infection-associated microcephaly.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 21%
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 33%
Social Sciences 7 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 16 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2017.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
#52
of 446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,394
of 399,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
#11
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 446 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.