↓ Skip to main content

Gas tamponade followed by laser treatment for macular retinal detachment secondary to optic pit.

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gas tamponade followed by laser treatment for macular retinal detachment secondary to optic pit.
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, January 2023
DOI 10.5935/0004-2749.20230066
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leandro Chaves, Julian Costa, Thaís Bastos, Marina Albuquerque, Ingrid Scott, Rodrigo Jorge

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2022.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
#155
of 445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,798
of 475,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 445 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.