You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalência e significância clínica de interações fármaco-nutrição enteral em Unidades de Terapia Intensiva
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.5935/0034-7167.20140011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adriano Max Moreira Reis, Rhanna Emanuela Fontenele Lima de Carvalho, Leila Marcia Pereira de Faria, Regina Célia de Oliveira, Karine Santana de Azevedo Zago, Milena Ferreira Cavelagna, Adriano Gomes Silva, Manoel Luis Neto, Silvia Helena de Bortoli Cassiani |
| Abstract |
This is a multicenter, cross-sectional retrospective study, which aimed to determine the prevalence of interactions drug-enteral nutrition (EN) in Intensive Care Units (ICU) of seven teaching hospitals in Brazil, and to analyze the clinical significance of them. Information on medications and EN administered with 24 hours and 120 hours of hospitalization were collected. For identification of drug-EN interaction was employed software Drug Reax®. It was investigated 1.124 records. Of these, 320 patients, with 24 hours of hospitalization, were on EN, and 20 (6.3%) had drug-EN interaction. Of the 504 patients with 120 hours of hospitalization, 39 (7.7%) had drug-EN interaction. The most frequent drug-EN interactions of clinical significance were phenytoin-EN, warfarin-EN and levothyroxine-EN. Drug-EN interactions may interfere with the quality and cost effectiveness of care in ICU, so it is essential that the health team has knowledge about them. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 24% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 16% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 29% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#560
of 738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,470
of 319,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 738 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.