↓ Skip to main content

CLASSIFICAÇÃO DE ÁGUAS MINERAIS BASEADA EM IMAGENS DIGITAIS OBTIDAS POR SMARTPHONES

Overview of attention for article published in Química Nova, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CLASSIFICAÇÃO DE ÁGUAS MINERAIS BASEADA EM IMAGENS DIGITAIS OBTIDAS POR SMARTPHONES
Published in
Química Nova, January 2016
DOI 10.5935/0100-4042.20160088
Authors

Gerson F. Silva Neto, Alexandre Fonseca, Jez W. B. Braga

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 17%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 7 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 33%
Computer Science 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Materials Science 1 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Química Nova
#375
of 450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,048
of 399,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Química Nova
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 450 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.