↓ Skip to main content

Biomarcadores da injúria renal aguda

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biomarcadores da injúria renal aguda
Published in
Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, October 2013
DOI 10.5935/0101-2800.20130036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luis Alberto Batista Peres, Ademar Dantas da Cunha Júnior, Alex Júnior Schäfer, Aline Liene da Silva, Arianne Ditzel Gaspar, Deborah Francisca Scarpari, Julia Barazetti Ferrari Alves, Rodolfo Girelli Neto, Thaís Figueiredo Teodoro de Oliveira

Abstract

Creatinine remains the standard for laboratory diagnosis of AKI. Efforts to prevent nephrotoxicity have been harmed by the delay in the diagnosis of AKI criteria by using only the creatinine as a marker, therefore there is great interest in identifying early reliable biomarkers. Moreover, early treatment of ARF can be correlated with a better prognosis and identification of biomarkers for early diagnosis would improve the efficacy of a therapeutic strategy. Thus, it becomes imperative to find biomarkers that can stratify correctly the extent of renal damage that each patient has suffered and the risk of developing chronic kidney disease (CKD). Here, we review the main features of emerging biomarkers in nephrology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 95 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 13%
Student > Postgraduate 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 6%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 24 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#267
of 364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,380
of 220,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.