↓ Skip to main content

Adaptação transcultural para o português de instrumentos de avaliação do estado nutricional de pacientes em diálise

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adaptação transcultural para o português de instrumentos de avaliação do estado nutricional de pacientes em diálise
Published in
Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, January 2014
DOI 10.5935/0101-2800.20140028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renata Lemos Fetter, Fernanda Guedes Bigogno, Fernanda Galvão Pasculli de Oliveira, Carla Maria Avesani

Abstract

Introduction: The 7 point subjective global assessment (7p-SGA) and the malnutrition inflammation score (MIS) are tools commonly applied for the assessment of nutritional status in dialyzed patients. Both were developed in English and require translation to Portuguese to be applied in Brazil. The cross-cultural equivalence process ensures semantic and measurement equivalence of a translated tool. Objective: To perform the cross-cultural adaptation to Portuguese of the 7p-SGA and MIS. Methods: Semantic equivalence was performed by the back-translation method and by assessing the degree of similarity between the original instrument and that back-translated from Portuguese to English (Back-translation). The assessment of the equivalence measurement was made by evaluating the intern reliability (Cronbach's α) and interobserver reliability (two observers). One-hundred and one elderly patients on hemodialysis (HD) were included. Results: Both instruments showed a high degree of semantic similarity with results close to the maximum value (7p-SGA 96.8 ± 7.8 and MIS 99.6 ± 1.4). The intern consistency showed a Cronbach's α value for 7p-SGA of 0.72 and of 0.53 for MIS. The interobserver reproducibility of 7p-SGA was moderate (intraclass coefficient [ICC] = 0.74 [95% CI: 0.58; 0.84]), while for MIS was strong (ICC = 0.88 [95% CI: 0.81; 0.93]). Conclusion: The 7p-SGA and MIS translated into Portuguese can be applied for assessing the nutritional status of elderly patients on HD. Studies testing the applicability of these instruments in adult patients on HD and in peritoneal dialysis should yet be performed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 18%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 24%
Psychology 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#306
of 364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,467
of 319,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#19
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.