↓ Skip to main content

Impacto da sessão de hemodiálise na força de preensão manual

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impacto da sessão de hemodiálise na força de preensão manual
Published in
Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, January 2015
DOI 10.5935/0101-2800.20150072
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Paula Pinto, Christiane Ishikawa Ramos, Marion Schneider Meireles, Maria Ayako Kamimura, Lilian Cuppari

Abstract

Handgrip strength (HGS) is a simple and reliable method with a good predictive clinical value for assessing muscle function of patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). However, there is no consensus regarding the appropriate moment for performing the HGS measurement since the performance of the HGS can be influenced by fluid, electrolyte and blood pressure changes that affect patients on HD. To investigate the impact of the dialysis session on the HGS in patients undergoing HD. This is a cross-sectional study with 156 patients [57.7% male, median age of 56.5 (42-67) years old, 28.8% diabetes, mean BMI of 24.75 ± 4.5 kg/m2 and HD vintage of 38 (19.25 to 72.75) months]. Measures of HGS were performed with a dynamometer during the initial minutes of the HD session and at the end of the session. The values obtained were compared with a national standard reference. Clinical, demographic and laboratory data were collected from medical records. A significant reduction of HGS was observed after the HD session (28.6 ± 11.4 kg to 27.7 ± 11.7 kg; p < 0.01). The prevalence of patients with HGS below the 30th percentile increased from 44.9% to 55.1% (p < 0.01). The decrease in blood pressure during dialysis was the only factor associated with the reduction of HGS. These findings show that the HD procedure affects negatively the HGS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 20%
Student > Master 10 13%
Researcher 5 6%
Professor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 21 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 18%
Sports and Recreations 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 28 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2024.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#153
of 364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,894
of 359,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#8
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.