↓ Skip to main content

Inquérito Brasileiro de Diálise Crônica 2014

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 364)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inquérito Brasileiro de Diálise Crônica 2014
Published in
Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, January 2016
DOI 10.5935/0101-2800.20160009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricardo Cintra Sesso, Antonio Alberto Lopes, Fernando Saldanha Thomé, Jocemir Ronaldo Lugon, Carmen Tzanno Martins

Abstract

National chronic dialysis data have had impact in the treatment planning. To report data of the annual survey of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology about chronic kidney disease patients on dialysis in July 2014. A survey based on data of dialysis units from the whole country. The data collection was performed by using a questionnaire filled out on-line by the dialysis units. Three hundred twelve (44%) of the dialysis units in the country answered the questionnaire. In July 2014, the total estimated number of patients on dialysis was 112,004. The estimated prevalence and incidence rates of chronic maintenance dialysis were 552 (range: 364 in the North region and 672 in the Southeast) and 180 patients per million population (pmp), respectively. The annual incidence rate of patients with diabetic nephropathy was 77 pmp. The annual gross mortality rate was 19%. For prevalent patients, 91% were on hemodialysis and 9% on peritoneal dialysis, 32,499 (29%) were on a waiting list of renal transplant, 37% were overweight/obese, 29% were diabetics, 16% had PTH levels > 600 pg/ml and 26% hemoglobin < 10 g/dl. A venous catheter was the vascular access for 17% of the hemodialysis patients. During 2011-2014 the prevalence and incidence rates of patients on dialysis tended to increase, while the gross mortality rate remained stable. In 2014, diabetes was the primary renal disease in 42% of the new dialysis patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
Unknown 180 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 51 28%
Student > Master 39 21%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Professor 9 5%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 32 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 37 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,597,909
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#40
of 364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,628
of 399,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.