↓ Skip to main content

Uso de everolimo de novo em receptores de transplante renal com doador vivo HLA idêntico

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uso de everolimo de novo em receptores de transplante renal com doador vivo HLA idêntico
Published in
Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, January 2016
DOI 10.5935/0101-2800.20160032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marina Pontello Cristelli, Alexandra Ferreira, Pedro Hannun, Claudia Felipe, Wilson Aguiar, Marcello Franco, Hélio Tedesco-Silva, José Medina-Pestana

Abstract

Kidney transplant recipients from HLA-identical living donor have lower risk of acute rejection and greater graft survival compared to other types of kidney transplantation. Immunosuppressive regimens without calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) can further improve these results by reducing cardiovascular, metabolic and toxic events related to this drug class. This study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of a new immunosuppressive regimen with planned suspension of CNI. This was a prospective, single center and single treatment arm study to evaluate HLA-identical kidney transplant recipients receiving everolimus (EVR), tacrolimus (TAC) and corticosteroids, followed by TAC discontinuation 30 days after transplantation. TAC discontinuation was later postponed to the third month after an interim efficacy analysis. Thirty-nine patients were included. Although mean TAC and EVR blood concentrations have remained within the proposed therapeutic ranges, five patients had biopsy-proven acute rejection and one patient had an episode of C4D-positive glomerulitis. This result led to the end of the inclusions. Interestingly, the proportion of patients with proteinuria greater than 0.5 g/L has not reached more than 22% of patients in any visit. Adverse events related to EVR use were the most incident in this population: oral ulcers, dyslipidemia and peripheral edema. The proposed scheme was not effective for this population, particularly due to a high incidence of acute rejection. Safety profile showed that prolonged exposure to a high concentration of blood EVR increases the incidence of adverse events related to this drug.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 8 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Unknown 9 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#266
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,035
of 399,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.