↓ Skip to main content

Life-saving vascular access in vascular capital exhaustion: single center experience in intra-atrial catheters for hemodialysis

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Life-saving vascular access in vascular capital exhaustion: single center experience in intra-atrial catheters for hemodialysis
Published in
Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, January 2017
DOI 10.5935/0101-2800.20170006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Pereira, Noélia Lopez, Iolanda Godinho, Sofia Jorge, Estela Nogueira, Fernando Neves, Alice Fortes, António G. Costa

Abstract

Intra-atrial catheter (IAC) placement through an open surgical approach has emerged as a life-saving technique in hemodialysis (HD) patients with vascular access exhaustion. To assess the complications of IAC placement, as well as patient and vascular access survival after this procedure. The authors retrospectively analyzed all seven patients with vascular capital exhaustion, without immediate alternative renal replacement therapy (RRT), who underwent IAC placement between January 2004 and December 2015 at a single center. Seven patients were submitted to twelve IAC placements. Bleeding (6/7) and infections (3/7) were the main complications in the early postoperative period. Two (2/7, 29%) patients died from early complications and 5/7 were discharged with a properly functioning IAC. The most frequent late complication was catheter accidental dislodgement in all remaining five patients, followed by catheter thrombosis and catheter-related infections in the same proportion (2/5). During follow-up, two of five patients died from vascular accesses complications. After IAC failure, one patient was transferred to peritoneal dialysis and a kidney transplant was performed in the other. Only one patient remains on HD after the third IAC, with a survival of 50 months. The mean patient survival after IAC placement was 19 ± 25 (0-60) months and the mean IAC patency was 8 ± 11 (0-34) months. Placing an IAC to perform HD is associated to significant risks and high mortality. However, when alternative RRT are exhausted, or as a bridge to others modalities, this option should be considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#267
of 365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#320,195
of 421,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 365 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.