↓ Skip to main content

Implantacao de protocolo de reducao de sedacao profunda baseado em analgesia comprovadamente seguro e factivel em pacientes submetidos a ventilacao mecanica

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 350)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implantacao de protocolo de reducao de sedacao profunda baseado em analgesia comprovadamente seguro e factivel em pacientes submetidos a ventilacao mecanica
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2013
DOI 10.5935/0103-507x.20130034
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillermo Bugedo, Eduardo Tobar, Marcia Aguirre, Hugo Gonzalez, Jorge Godoy, Maria Teresa Lira, Pilar Lora, Eduardo Encalada, Antonio Hernandez, Vinko Tomicic, Jose Castro, Juan Jara, Max Andresen, Hector Ugarte

Abstract

Deep sedation in critically ill patients is associated with a longer duration of mechanical ventilation and a prolonged length of stay in the intensive care unit. Several protocols have been used to improve these outcomes. We implement and evaluate an analgesia-based, goal-directed, nurse-driven sedation protocol used to treat critically ill patients who receive mechanical ventilation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 2 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 4%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 35 70%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 36 72%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,660,035
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#41
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,588
of 289,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.