↓ Skip to main content

Extubação fora do leito: um estudo de viabilidade

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 350)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extubação fora do leito: um estudo de viabilidade
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2014
DOI 10.5935/0103-507x.20140037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felippe Leopoldo Dexheimer, Patrini Silveira Vesz, Rafael Viegas Cremonese, Clarissa Garcia Soares Leães, Ana Carolina Tabajara Raupp, Cristiano dos Santos Rodrigues, Juliana Mara Stormovski de Andrade, Raquel da Silva Townsend, Juçara Gasparetto Maccari, Cassiano Teixeira

Abstract

In clinical intensive care practice, weaning from mechanical ventilation is accompanied by concurrent early patient mobilization. The aim of this study was to compare the success of extubation performed with patients seated in an armchair compared to extubation with patients in a supine position. A retrospective study, observational and non-randomized was conducted in a mixed-gender, 23-bed intensive care unit. The primary study outcome was success of extubation, which was defined as the patient tolerating the removal of the endotracheal tube for at least 48 hours. The differences between the study groups were assessed using Student's t-test and chi-squared analysis. Ninety-one patients were included from December 2010 and June 2011. The study population had a mean age of 71 years ± 12 months, a mean APACHE II score of 21±7.6, and a mean length of mechanical ventilation of 2.6±2 days. Extubation was performed in 33 patients who were seated in an armchair (36%) and in 58 patients in a supine position (64%). There were no significant differences in age, mean APACHE II score or length of mechanical ventilation between the two groups, and a similar extubation success rate was observed (82%, seated group versus 85%, supine group, p>0.05). Furthermore, no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of post-extubation distress, need for tracheostomy, duration of mechanical ventilation weaning, or intensive care unit stay. Our results suggest that the clinical outcomes of patients extubated in a seated position are similar to those of patients extubated in a supine position. This new practice of seated extubation was not associated with adverse events and allowed extubation to occur simultaneously with early mobilization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 42 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 18%
Other 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 20%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,248,711
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#14
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,061
of 319,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.