↓ Skip to main content

Valor prognóstico da disfunção ventricular diastólica em pacientes com sepse grave e choque séptico

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Valor prognóstico da disfunção ventricular diastólica em pacientes com sepse grave e choque séptico
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2015
DOI 10.5935/0103-507x.20150057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gustavo Rolando, Emilio Daniel Valenzuela Espinoza, Emelin Avid, Sebastián Welsh, Juan Del Pozo, Alejandro Risso Vazquez, Yanina Arzani, Fabio Daniel Masevicius, Arnaldo Dubin

Abstract

To evaluate the prevalence of myocardial dysfunction and its prognostic value in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Adult septic patients admitted to an intensive care unit were prospectively studied using transthoracic echocardiography within the first 48 hours after admission and thereafter on the 7th-10th days. Echocardiographic variables of biventricular function, including the E/e' ratio, were compared between survivors and non-survivors. A total of 99 echocardiograms (53 at admission and 46 between days 7 - 10) were performed on 53 patients with a mean age of 74 (SD 13) years. Systolic and diastolic dysfunction was present in 14 (26%) and 42 (83%) patients, respectively, and both types of dysfunction were present in 12 (23%) patients. The E/e' ratio, an index of diastolic dysfunction, was the best predictor of hospital mortality according to the area under the ROC curve (0.71) and was an independent predictor of outcome, as determined by multivariate analysis (OR = 1.36 [1.05 - 1.76], p = 0.02). In septic patients admitted to an intensive care unit, echocardiographic systolic dysfunction is not associated with increased mortality. In contrast, diastolic dysfunction is an independent predictor of outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 48%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,474,955
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#97
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,477
of 359,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.