↓ Skip to main content

Eventos adversos por interações medicamentosas potenciais em unidade de terapia intensiva de um hospital de ensino

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 363)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eventos adversos por interações medicamentosas potenciais em unidade de terapia intensiva de um hospital de ensino
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2015
DOI 10.5935/0103-507x.20150060
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariana Macedo Alvim, Lidiane Ayres da Silva, Isabel Cristina Gonçalves Leite, Marcelo Silva Silvério

Abstract

To evaluate the incidence of potential drug-drug interactions in an intensive care unit of a hospital, focusing on antimicrobial drugs. This cross-sectional study analyzed electronic prescriptions of patients admitted to the intensive care unit of a teaching hospital between January 1 and March 31, 2014 and assessed potential drug-drug interactions associated with antimicrobial drugs. Antimicrobial drug consumption levels were expressed in daily doses per 100 patient-days. The search and classification of the interactions were based on the Micromedex® system. The daily prescriptions of 82 patients were analyzed, totaling 656 prescriptions. Antimicrobial drugs represented 25% of all prescription drugs, with meropenem, vancomycin and ceftriaxone being the most prescribed medications. According to the approach of daily dose per 100 patient-days, the most commonly used antimicrobial drugs were cefepime, meropenem, sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim and ciprofloxacin. The mean number of interactions per patient was 2.6. Among the interactions, 51% were classified as contraindicated or significantly severe. Highly significant interactions (clinical value 1 and 2) were observed with a prevalence of 98%. The current study demonstrated that antimicrobial drugs are frequently prescribed in intensive care units and present a very high number of potential drug-drug interactions, with most of them being considered highly significant.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 40%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,480,576
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#26
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,790
of 361,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.