↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines for the assessment and acceptance of potential brain-dead organ donors

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guidelines for the assessment and acceptance of potential brain-dead organ donors
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2016
DOI 10.5935/0103-507x.20160049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Glauco Adrieno Westphal, Valter Duro Garcia, Rafael Lisboa de Souza, Cristiano Augusto Franke, Kalinca Daberkow Vieira, Viviane Renata Zaclikevis Birckholz, Miriam Cristine Machado, Eliana Régia Barbosa de Almeida, Fernando Osni Machado, Luiz Antônio da Costa Sardinha, Raquel Wanzuita, Carlos Eduardo Soares Silvado, Gerson Costa, Vera Braatz, Milton Caldeira Filho, Rodrigo Furtado, Luana Alves Tannous, André Gustavo Neves de Albuquerque, Edson Abdala, Anderson Ricardo Roman Gonçalves, Lúcio Filgueiras Pacheco-Moreira, Fernando Suparregui Dias, Rogério Fernandes, Frederico Di Giovanni, Frederico Bruzzi de Carvalho, Alfredo Fiorelli, Cassiano Teixeira, Cristiano Feijó, Spencer Marcantonio Camargo, Neymar Elias de Oliveira, André Ibrahim David, Rafael Augusto Dantas Prinz, Laura Brasil Herranz, Joel de Andrade, Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira, Associação de Transplante de Brasileira Órgãos

Abstract

Organ transplantation is the only alternative for many patients with terminal diseases. The increasing disproportion between the high demand for organ transplants and the low rate of transplants actually performed is worrisome. Some of the causes of this disproportion are errors in the identification of potential organ donors and in the determination of contraindications by the attending staff. Therefore, the aim of the present document is to provide guidelines for intensive care multi-professional staffs for the recognition, assessment and acceptance of potential organ donors.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 246 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 49 20%
Student > Master 30 12%
Student > Postgraduate 21 9%
Other 19 8%
Researcher 13 5%
Other 49 20%
Unknown 65 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 9%
Engineering 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 75 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#282
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#341,814
of 399,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#16
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.