You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Brazilian version of the Functional Status Score for the ICU: translation and cross-cultural adaptation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.5935/0103-507x.20170006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vinicius Zacarias Maldaner da Silva, Jose Aires de Araújo Neto, Gerson Cipriano, Mariela Pinedo, Dale M. Needham, Jennifer M. Zanni, Fernando Silva Guimarães |
| Abstract |
The aim of the present study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Functional Status Score for the intensive care unit (FSS-ICU) into Brazilian Portuguese. This study consisted of the following steps: translation (performed by two independent translators), synthesis of the initial translation, back-translation (by two independent translators who were unaware of the original FSS-ICU), and testing to evaluate the target audience's understanding. An Expert Committee supervised all steps and was responsible for the modifications made throughout the process and the final translated version. The testing phase included two experienced physiotherapists who assessed a total of 30 critical care patients (mean FSS-ICU score = 25 ± 6). As the physiotherapists did not report any uncertainties or problems with interpretation affecting their performance, no additional adjustments were made to the Brazilian Portuguese version after the testing phase. Good interobserver reliability between the two assessors was obtained for each of the 5 FSS-ICU tasks and for the total FSS-ICU score (intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.88 to 0.91). The adapted version of the FSS-ICU in Brazilian Portuguese was easy to understand and apply in an intensive care unit environment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 25% |
| Brazil | 3 | 19% |
| Saint Lucia | 1 | 6% |
| Thailand | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 88% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 48 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,692,682
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#30
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,911
of 421,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#6
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.