↓ Skip to main content

Impact of implementing a protocol of respiratory care measures and optimization of mechanical ventilation in potential lung donors

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of implementing a protocol of respiratory care measures and optimization of mechanical ventilation in potential lung donors
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2020
DOI 10.5935/0103-507x.20200095
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Guillermo Bezzi, Carla Candela Brovia, Juan Manuel Carballo, Maia Inés Elías, Agustina Belén Moreno, Vanesa Romina Ruiz, Fernanda Cordiviola, David Barbieri, Adriana Fariña, Silvina Borello

Abstract

To describe the results from the implementation of a respiratory care and mechanical ventilation protocol on potential lung donors who met the conditions for procurement. The secondary objective is to compare the results with historical data. This was a retrospective, observational study. It included potential donors suitable for procurement of organs who had brain death and were hospitalized in critical care units of the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires from April 2017 to March 2018. Main variables: number of potential lung donors that reached the objective of procurement, rate of lungs procured, and rate of implanted lungs. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant. Thirty potential lung donors were included, and 23 (88.5%; 95%CI 69.8 - 97.6) met the oxygenation objective. Twenty potential lung donors donated organs, of whom eight donated lungs, with which four double lung transplants and eight single lung transplants were performed. Seven of 12 lungs were procured and implanted in the preprotocol period, while all 12 were under the protocol (p = 0.38). The implantation rate was 58.3% (7/12) in the historical control period and 100% (12/12) (p = 0.04) in the study period.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 30%
Unspecified 1 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2021.
All research outputs
#14,267,034
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#115
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,940
of 473,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.