You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Extubation in the pediatric intensive care unit: predictive methods. An integrative literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.5935/0103-507x.20210039 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jéssica Cristina da Silva Moura, Lívea Gianfrancesco, Tiago Henrique de Souza, Taís Daiene Russo Hortencio, Roberto José Negrão Nogueira |
| Abstract |
For extubation in pediatric patients, the evaluation of readiness is strongly recommended. However, a device or practice that is superior to clinical judgment has not yet been accurately determined. Thus, it is important to conduct a review on the techniques of choice in clinical practice to predict extubation failure in pediatric patients. Based on a search in the PubMed®, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases, we conducted a survey of the predictive variables of extubation failure most commonly used in clinical practice in pediatric patients. Of the eight predictors described, the three most commonly used were the spontaneous breathing test, the rapid shallow breathing index and maximum inspiratory pressure. Although the disparity of the data presented in the studies prevented statistical treatment, it was still possible to describe and analyze the performance of these tests. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 25% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,361,749
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#78
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,539
of 519,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#7
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.