You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chegando a um consenso: vantagens e desvantagens do Sepsis 3 considerando países de recursos limitados
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.5935/0103-507x.20160068 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Flavia Ribeiro Machado, Murillo Santucci Cesar de Assunção, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, André Miguel Japiassú, Luciano Cesar Pontes de Azevedo, Mirella Cristine Oliveira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 10% |
| Yemen | 1 | 10% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 10% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 10% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 47 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 46 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2017.
All research outputs
#5,241,988
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#54
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,079
of 399,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.