You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Safe prone checklist: construction and implementation of a tool for performing the prone maneuver
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.5935/0103-507x.20170023 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vanessa Martins Oliveira, Daniele Martins Piekala, Gracieli Nadalon Deponti, Danusa Cassiana Rigo Batista, Sílvia Daniela Minossi, Marcele Chisté, Patrícia Maurello Neves Bairros, Wagner da Silva Naue, Dulce Inês Welter, Sílvia Regina Rios Vieira |
| Abstract |
To construct and implement an instrument (checklist) to improve safety when performing the prone maneuver. This was an applied, qualitative and descriptive study. The instrument was developed based on a broad review of the literature pertaining to the construction of a care protocol using the main electronic databases (MEDLINE, LILACS and Cochrane). We describe the construction of a patient safety tool with numerous modifications and adaptations based on the observations of the multidisciplinary team regarding its use in daily practice. The use of the checklist when performing the prone maneuver increased the safety and reliability of the procedure. The team's understanding of the tool's importance to patient safety and training in its use are necessary for its success. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 171 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 11% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Professor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 56 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 49 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 60 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,253,564
of 25,564,614 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#5
of 362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,508
of 422,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,564,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 362 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.