↓ Skip to main content

Recent advances in bedside microcirculation assessment in critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recent advances in bedside microcirculation assessment in critically ill patients
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2017
DOI 10.5935/0103-507x.20170033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philipe Franco do Amaral Tafner, Felipe Ko Chen, Roberto Rabello Filho, Thiago Domingos Corrêa, Renato Carneiro de Freitas Chaves, Ary Serpa Neto

Abstract

Parameters related to macrocirculation, such as the mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, cardiac output, mixed venous saturation and central oxygen saturation, are commonly used in the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patients. However, several studies have shown that there is a dissociation between these parameters and the state of microcirculation in this group of patients. Techniques that allow direct viewing of the microcirculation are not completely disseminated, nor are they incorporated into the clinical management of patients in shock. The numerous techniques developed for microcirculation assessment include clinical assessment (e.g., peripheral perfusion index and temperature gradient), laser Doppler flowmetry, tissue oxygen assessment electrodes, videomicroscopy (orthogonal polarization spectral imaging, sidestream dark field imaging or incident dark field illumination) and near infrared spectroscopy. In the near future, the monitoring and optimization of tissue perfusion by direct viewing and microcirculation assessment may become a goal to be achieved in the hemodynamic resuscitation of critically ill patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Other 29 25%
Unknown 32 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Engineering 6 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 36 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2018.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#164
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,029
of 421,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#17
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.