You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diretrizes Brasileiras de Mobilização Precoce em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.5935/0103-507x.20190084 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Esperidião Elias Aquim, Wanderley Marques Bernardo, Renata Ferreira Buzzini, Nara Selaimen Gaertner de Azeredo, Laura Severo da Cunha, Marta Cristina Pauleti Damasceno, Rafael Alexandre de Oliveira Deucher, Antonio Carlos Magalhães Duarte, Juliana Thiemy Librelato, Cesar Augusto Melo-Silva, Sergio Nogueira Nemer, Sabrina Donatti Ferreira da Silva, Cleber Verona |
| Abstract |
Immobility can cause several complications, including skeletal muscle atrophy and weakness, that influence the recovery of critically ill patients. This effect can be mitigated by early mobilization. Six key questions guided this research: Is early mobilization safe? Which patients are candidates for early mobilization? What are the contraindications? What is the appropriate dose, and how should it be defined? What results are obtained? What are the prognostic indicators for the use of early mobilization? The objective of this guideline was to produce a document that would provide evidence-based recommendations and suggestions regarding the early mobilization of critically ill adult patients, with the aim of improving understanding of the topic and making a positive impact on patient care. This guideline was based on a systematic review of articles conducted using the PICO search strategy, as recommended by the Guidelines Project of the Associação Médica Brasileira. Randomized clinical trials, prognostic cohort studies, and systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis were selected, and the evidence was classified according to the Oxford Center for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. For all the questions addressed, enough evidence was found to support safe and well-defined early mobilization, with prognostic indicators that support and recommend the technique. Early mobilization is associated with better functional outcomes and should be performed whenever indicated. Early mobilization is safe and should be the goal of the entire multidisciplinary team. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 20% |
| Japan | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 219 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 5% |
| Researcher | 9 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 113 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 118 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2020.
All research outputs
#6,414,093
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#64
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,698
of 446,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.