↓ Skip to main content

Diretrizes para o tratamento farmacológico da COVID-19. Consenso da Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira, da Sociedade Brasileira de Infectologia e da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e…

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 350)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
325 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diretrizes para o tratamento farmacológico da COVID-19. Consenso da Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira, da Sociedade Brasileira de Infectologia e da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, July 2020
DOI 10.5935/0103-507x.20200039
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maicon Falavigna, Verônica Colpani, Cinara Stein, Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo, Angela Maria Bagattini, Gabriela Vilela de Brito, José Miguel Chatkin, Sergio Cimerman, Mirian de Freitas Dal Ben Corradi, Clovis Arns da Cunha, Flávia Cordeiro de Medeiros, Haliton Alves de Oliveira, Leandro Genehr Fritscher, Marcelo Basso Gazzana, Débora Dalmas Gräf, Lays Pires Marra, Jessica Yumi Matuoka, Michelle Silva Nunes, Daniela Vianna Pachito, Cássia Garcia Moraes Pagano, Patrícia do Carmo Silva Parreira, Rachel Riera, Amilton Silva Júnior, Bruno de Melo Tavares, Alexandre Prehn Zavascki, Regis Goulart Rosa, Felipe Dal-Pizzol

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 325 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 325 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 75 23%
Student > Master 29 9%
Researcher 14 4%
Other 10 3%
Professor 10 3%
Other 37 11%
Unknown 150 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 36 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 23 7%
Unknown 161 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,761,708
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#16
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,909
of 430,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them