You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
First Brazilian recommendation on physiotherapy with sensory motor stimulation in newborns and infants in the intensive care unit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.5935/0103-507x.20210002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cíntia Johnston, Mônica Sanchez Stopiglia, Simone Nascimento Santos Ribeiro, Cristiane Sousa Nascimento Baez, Silvana Alves Pereira |
| Abstract |
To present guidelines on sensory motor stimulation for newborns and infants in the intensive care unit. We employed a mixed methods design with a systematic review of the literature and recommendations based on scientific evidence and the opinions of physiotherapists with neonatal expertise. The research included studies published between 2010 and 2018 in the MEDLINE® and Cochrane databases that included newborns (preterm and term) and infants (between 28 days and 6 months of age) hospitalized in the intensive care unit and submitted to sensory motor stimulation methods. The studies found were classified according to the GRADE score by five physiotherapists in different regions of Brazil and presented at eight Scientific Congresses held to discuss the clinical practice guidelines. We included 89 articles to construct the clinical practice guidelines. Auditory, gustatory and skin-to-skin stimulation stand out for enhancing vital signs, and tactile-kinesthetic massage and multisensory stimulation stand out for improving weight or sucking. Although all modalities have good ratings for pain or stress control, it is recommended that sensory motor stimulation procedures be tailored to the infant's specific needs and that interventions and be carried out by expert professionals. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 53 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 52 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#22,774,430
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#282
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#448,987
of 519,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#20
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.