You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparação de parâmetros eletrofisiológicos das estimulações cardíacas endocárdicas septal e apical
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.5935/1678-9741.20120055 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juan Carlos Pachón Mateos, José Carlos Pachón Mateos, Remy Nelson Albornoz Vargas, Enrique Indalécio Pachón Mateos, Khalil Cosac, Hugo Belloti Lopes, Fabrizio Achilles Soares, Amanda Guerra Moraes Rego Sousa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#214
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,873
of 250,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#16
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.