You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correção da ruptura de cordas tendíneas na insuficiência mitral degenerativa pelo emprego de cordas padronizadas de pericárdio bovino
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.5935/1678-9741.20130007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francisco Gregori Júnior, Moacir Fernandes de Godoy, Celso Otaviano Cordeiro, Alexandre Noboru Murakami, Rogerio Teruya, Sergio Shigueru Hayashi, Wallace Kohata de Aquino, Luiz Eduardo Gallina |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#60
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,555
of 207,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.