You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of variables responsible for hospital mortality in patients with rheumatic heart disease undergoing double valve replacement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.5935/1678-9741.20140044 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
André Maurício Souza Fernandes, Gustavo Maltez de Andrade, Rafael Marcelino Oliveira, Gabriela Tanajura Biscaia, Francisco Farias Borges dos Reis, Cristiano Ricardo Macedo, Andre Rodrigues Durães, Roque Aras |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#214
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,187
of 319,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#14
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.