↓ Skip to main content

Cardiomyopathy induced by artificial cardiac pacing: myth or reality sustained by evidence?

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 363)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiomyopathy induced by artificial cardiac pacing: myth or reality sustained by evidence?
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, January 2014
DOI 10.5935/1678-9741.20140104
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrés Di Leoni Ferrari, Anibal Pires Borges, Luciano Cabral Albuquerque, Carolina Pelzer Sussenbach, Priscila Raupp da Rosa, Ricardo Medeiros Piantá, Mario Wiehe, Marco Antônio Goldani

Abstract

Implantable cardiac pacing systems are a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic irreversible bradycardia. Under the proper indications, cardiac pacing might bring significant clinical benefit. Evidences from literature state that the action of the artificial pacing system, mainly when the ventricular lead is located at the apex of the right ventricle, produces negative effects to cardiac structure (remodeling, dilatation) and function (dissinchrony). Patients with previously compromised left ventricular function would benefit the least with conventional right ventricle apical pacing, and are exposed to the risk of developing higher incidence of morbidity and mortality for heart failure. However, after almost 6 decades of cardiac pacing, just a reduced portion of patients in general would develop these alterations. In this context, there are not completely clear some issues related to cardiac pacing and the development of this cardiomyopathy. Causality relationships among QRS widening with a left bundle branch block morphology, contractility alterations within the left ventricle, and certain substrates or clinical (previous systolic dysfunction, structural heart disease, time from implant) or electrical conditions (QRS duration, percentage of ventricular stimulation) are still subjecte of debate. This review analyses contemporary data regarding this new entity, and discusses alternatives of how to use cardiac pacing in this context, emphasizing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 48%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,274,343
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#13
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,577
of 319,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.