↓ Skip to main content

Twenty years of vasoplegic syndrome treatment in heart surgery. Methylene blue revised

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Twenty years of vasoplegic syndrome treatment in heart surgery. Methylene blue revised
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, January 2015
DOI 10.5935/1678-9741.20140115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulo Roberto Barbosa Evora, Lafaiete Alves, Cesar Augusto Ferreira, Antônio Carlos Menardi, Solange Bassetto, Alfredo José Rodrigues, Adilson Scorzoni, Walter Vilella de Andrade Vicente

Abstract

This study was conducted to reassess the concepts established over the past 20 years, in particular in the last 5 years, about the use of methylene blue in the treatment of vasoplegic syndrome in cardiac surgery. A wide literature review was carried out using the data extracted from: MEDLINE, SCOPUS and ISI WEB OF SCIENCE. The reassessed and reaffirmed concepts were 1) MB is safe in the recommended doses (the lethal dose is 40 mg/kg); 2) MB does not cause endothelial dysfunction; 3) The MB effect appears in cases of NO up-regulation; 4) MB is not a vasoconstrictor, by blocking the cGMP pathway it releases the cAMP pathway, facilitating the norepinephrine vasoconstrictor effect; 5) The most used dosage is 2 mg/kg as IV bolus, followed by the same continuous infusion because plasma concentrations sharply decrease in the first 40 minutes; and 6) There is a possible "window of opportunity" for MB's effectiveness. In the last five years, major challenges were: 1) Observations about side effects; 2) The need for prophylactic and therapeutic guidelines, and; 3) The need for the establishment of the MB therapeutic window in humans. MB action to treat vasoplegic syndrome is time-dependent. Therefore, the great challenge is the need, for the establishment the MB therapeutic window in humans. This would be the first step towards a systematic guideline to be followed by possible multicenter studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Student > Bachelor 1 2%
Student > Master 1 2%
Researcher 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 42 88%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Unknown 42 88%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2017.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#137
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,352
of 359,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.