↓ Skip to main content

Graft pathology at the time of harvest: impact on long-term survival

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Graft pathology at the time of harvest: impact on long-term survival
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, January 2014
DOI 10.5935/1678-9741.20140118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shi-Min Yuan, Yun Li, Yan Hong Ben, Xiao Feng Cheng, Da Zhu Li, De Min Li, Hua Jing

Abstract

This study aims to present the graft pathology at the time of harvest and its impact on long-term survival.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2015.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#214
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,184
of 319,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#14
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.