↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Cardiovascular Interventions on the Quality of Life in the Elderly

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of Cardiovascular Interventions on the Quality of Life in the Elderly
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, January 2015
DOI 10.5935/1678-9741.20150080
Pubmed ID
Authors

José Albuquerque de Figueiredo Neto, Lívia Mariane Castelo Branco Reis, Márcia Rodrigues Veras, Lorena Lauren Chaves Queiroz, Karine de Paiva Lima Nogueira Nunes, Priscylla de Oliveira Miranda, Alexsandro Ferreira dos Santos, Joana Kátya Veras Rodrigues Sampaio Nunes

Abstract

The elderly population is growing rapidly. Political and socio-economic changes led to the demographic transition in this population with the highest number of surgeries and as well as many comorbidities. To evaluate the impact of cardiovascular intervention on quality of life of elderly patients after three and six months. Analytical prospective cohort study with elderly between 60 and 80 years of age, of both sexes, with a diagnosis of coronary artery disease and underwent cardiovascular intervention during the period June 2010 to June 2011. Data were collected by individual interviews in the pre and postoperative periods (after three and six months) by telephone. We used the SF-36 to analyse quality of life in order to assess the physical and mental health of the study population. Of the 44 individuals evaluated, 59.1% were men, 75% in the range of 65 to 74 years, 38.6% were white and 38.6% were black, 31.8% were uneducated, 43.2% were married and 68.2% had less than a minimum wage. Prevailed patients: non-diabetics (68.2%), non-obese (81.8%), hypertensive (84.1%), non-alcoholic and non-smokers (68.2% and 61.4%, respectively). A significant increase in the average of the SF-36 scores between pre and post-surgical periods (three and six months) for the domains: functional capacity, pain, general health, vitality and emotional aspect. The elderly population undergoing intervention may have cardiovascular benefits and improvements of quality of life. Physical fitness improvement measures can be taken to resume that capability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 13%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 24 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Psychology 5 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 23 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2016.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#282
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,534
of 359,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#20
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.