↓ Skip to main content

Adjuvant Pericardial Sac Restraining in Heart Failure Treatment. A Medical Hypothesis Illustrated by a Case Report

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adjuvant Pericardial Sac Restraining in Heart Failure Treatment. A Medical Hypothesis Illustrated by a Case Report
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, January 2016
DOI 10.5935/1678-9741.20160004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulo Roberto Barbosa Evora, Minna Moreira D. Romano, Luis Gustavo Gali, André Schmidt, Alfredo José Rodrigues

Abstract

Ventricular constraint therapy has been used to prevent and reverse the progression of heart failure in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies. We hypothesized that ventricular restraint should be tried by closing the pericardium that was previously opened following left ventricle topographical projection. The surgical technique presentation is illustrated by a remarkable 13-year outcome of one patient with dilated cardiomyopathy treated surgically by mitral prosthesis, Cox/Maze III surgery to treat atrial fibrillation, and associated to the ventricular constraint using the patient's own pericardium. The ventricular pericardial restraint role is unclear, since the patient had multiple corrections that could be responsible for the good outcome; however it is viable deserving investigations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Librarian 2 15%
Professor 2 15%
Other 2 15%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Design 1 8%
Unknown 7 54%