You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Digisonic SP® Binaural cochlear implant: the coronal tunneled approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.5935/1808-8694.20130054 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guilherme Machado de Carvalho, Alexandre Caixeta Guimarães, Ivan Senis Cardoso Macedo, Lúcia Cristina Beltrame Onuki, Fabiana Danieli, Henrique Furlan Pauna, Fernando Laffitte Fernandes, Jorge Rizzato Paschoal, Walter Adriano Bianchini, Arthur Menino Castilho |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2018.
All research outputs
#15,516,483
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#318
of 726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,283
of 289,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#89
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.