↓ Skip to main content

Há evidências favorecendo o uso de betabloqueadores e dobutamina na insuficiência cardíaca aguda?

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Há evidências favorecendo o uso de betabloqueadores e dobutamina na insuficiência cardíaca aguda?
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, March 2013
DOI 10.5935/abc.20130034
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luiz Carlos Santana Passos, Andréa Cristina Costa Barbosa, Márcio Galvão Oliveira, Edval Gomes Santos

Abstract

Several studies have reported the benefits of beta-blockers (BB) for patients presenting with systolic heart failure. however, many patients hospitalized as a result of acute heart failure are already using BB and require dobutamine for arterial hypotension and low cardiac output. Therefore, a decision must be made regarding whether BB should be maintained or even started in such cases. The aim of this study was to establish whether there is evidence supporting the safety andyeffectiveness of BB together with dobutamine for patients presenting with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). We conducted a search of the English-language literature in the databases MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, Virtual Health Library, Cochrane Library and the CAPES Portal of Scientific Journals to identify related studies. Additional literature was obtained through the review of relevant references in the identified articles. The expected outcomes included information on the prognosis (in-hospital and on follow-up mortality, number of days of hospitalization and readmission),yeffectiveness and safety (worsening of symptoms, shock, intolerance) of the concomitant use of these drugs in hospitalized patients with ADHF and low cardiac output. This review included nine studies. however, no randomized clinical trials on this subject were found. Most studies include a low number of patients, and no studies addressing the safety of the concomitant use of these drugs were found. The resulting data suggest that a careful literature review did not supply evidence for the systematic use of BB in patients with low cardiac output syndrome who require dobutamine for inotropic support.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 19%
Other 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 55%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#820
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,936
of 208,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.