↓ Skip to main content

Racionalidade e métodos: estudo BREATHE - I registro brasileiro de insuficiência cardíaca

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Racionalidade e métodos: estudo BREATHE - I registro brasileiro de insuficiência cardíaca
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, May 2013
DOI 10.5935/abc.20130093
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luis Eduardo Paim Rohde, Luiz Claudio Danzmann, Manoel Fernandes Canesin, Conrado Roberto Hoffmann Filho, Abilio Augusto Fragata Filho, Antonio Baruzzi, Antonio Carlos Pereira-Barretto, Beatriz Bojikian Matsubara, Charles Mady, Denilson Campos de Albuquerque, Edimar Alcides Bocchi, Elias Pimentel Gouvea, Elizabete Silva dos Santos, Estevão Lanna Figueiredo, Felipe Montes Pena, Fernando Carvalho Neuenschwander, Gustavo Luiz Gouvea de Almeida Jr., Humberto Villacorta Jr., Jacqueline Sampaio, João Miguel de Malta Dantas, Marcelo Imbroinise Bittencourt, Marcelo Iorio Garcia, Mauro Esteves Hernandes, Marcus Vinícius Simões, Mucio Tavares de Oliveira Filho, Otávio Gebara, Paulo Roberto Nogueira, Renato Jorge Alves, Renato Delascio Lopes, Ricardo Gusmão, Ricardo Mourilhe Rocha, Ricardo Pavanello, Aguinaldo Freitas Júnior, Maria da Consolação Vieira Moreira, Roberto Luiz Marino, Salvador Rassi, Carlos V. Nascimento, Sidney Araújo São José, Alvaro Rabelo, Antonio Carlos Sobral Sousa, Eduardo Darzé, Fabio Serra Silveira, Gilson Soares Feitosa, Fabio Villas-Boas, João David de Souza Neto, José Albuquerque de Figueiredo Neto, Marcelo Silveira Teixeira, Silvia Marinho Martins, Maria Alayde Mendonça da Silva, Eduardo Costa, Helder José Lima Reis, Fernando Bacal, Otávio Berwanger, Hélio Penna Guimarães, Luiz Alberto Piva de Matos, Jadelson Andrade

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 6%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 22%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 14 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 16 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2016.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#1,002
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,547
of 207,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.