↓ Skip to main content

Gordura epicárdica: definição, medidas e revisão sistemática dos principais desfechos

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
235 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
284 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gordura epicárdica: definição, medidas e revisão sistemática dos principais desfechos
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, July 2013
DOI 10.5935/abc.20130138
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela Gallina Bertaso, Daniela Bertol, Bruce Bartholow Duncan, Murilo Foppa

Abstract

Epicardial fat (EF) is a visceral fat deposit, located between the heart and the pericardium, which shares many of the pathophysiological properties of other visceral fat deposits, It also potentially causes local inflammation and likely has direct effects on coronary atherosclerosis. Echocardiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging have been used to evaluate EF, but variations between methodologies limit the comparability between these modalities. We performed a systematic review of the literature finding associations of EF with metabolic syndrome and coronary artery disease. The summarization of these associations is limited by the heterogeneity of the methods used and the populations studied, where most of the subjects were at high cardiovascular disease risk. EF is also associated with other known factors, such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, age and hypertension, which makes the interpretation of its role as an independent risk marker intricate. Based on these data, we conclude that EF is a visceral fat deposit with potential implications in coronary artery disease. We describe the reference values of EF for the different imaging modalities, even though these have not yet been validated for clinical use. It is still necessary to better define normal reference values and the risk associated with EF to further evaluate its role in cardiovascular and metabolic risk assessment in relation to other criteria currently used.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 279 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 12%
Student > Bachelor 34 12%
Researcher 32 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 10%
Student > Postgraduate 20 7%
Other 63 22%
Unknown 72 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 119 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 5%
Engineering 11 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 83 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,156,627
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#127
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,757
of 209,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.