You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validation of the Killip-Kimball Classification and Late Mortality after Acute Myocardial Infarction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.5935/abc.20140091 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruno Henrique Gallindo de Mello, Gustavo Bernardes F. Oliveira, Rui Fernando Ramos, Bernardo Baptista C. Lopes, Cecília Bitarães S. Barros, Erick de Oliveira Carvalho, Fabio Bellini P. Teixeira, Guilherme D'Andréa S. Arruda, Maria Sol Calero Revelo, Leopoldo Soares Piegas |
| Abstract |
The classification or index of heart failure severity in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was proposed by Killip and Kimball aiming at assessing the risk of in-hospital death and the potential benefit of specific management of care provided in Coronary Care Units (CCU) during the decade of 60. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 229 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Researcher | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 72 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 112 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 74 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,148,903
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#171
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,635
of 240,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.