You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cardiac Remodeling: Concepts, Clinical Impact, Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Pharmacologic Treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.5935/abc.20160005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paula S. Azevedo, Bertha F. Polegato, Marcos F. Minicucci, Sergio A. R. Paiva, Leonardo A. M. Zornoff |
| Abstract |
Cardiac remodeling is defined as a group of molecular, cellular and interstitial changes that manifest clinically as changes in size, mass, geometry and function of the heart after injury. The process results in poor prognosis because of its association with ventricular dysfunction and malignant arrhythmias. Here, we discuss the concepts and clinical implications of cardiac remodeling, and the pathophysiological role of different factors, including cell death, energy metabolism, oxidative stress, inflammation, collagen, contractile proteins, calcium transport, geometry and neurohormonal activation. Finally, the article describes the pharmacological treatment of cardiac remodeling, which can be divided into three different stages of strategies: consolidated, promising and potential strategies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 759 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 757 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 125 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 97 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 97 | 13% |
| Researcher | 60 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 5% |
| Other | 106 | 14% |
| Unknown | 239 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 167 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 115 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 42 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 5% |
| Engineering | 38 | 5% |
| Other | 88 | 12% |
| Unknown | 269 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#518,515
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#7
of 1,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,438
of 397,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,222 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.