↓ Skip to main content

Reproducibility and Reliability of the Quality of Life Questionnaire in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reproducibility and Reliability of the Quality of Life Questionnaire in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, March 2016
DOI 10.5935/abc.20160026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rita Simone Lopes Moreira, Lucas Bassolli, Enia Coutinho, Paloma Ferrer, Érika Olivier Bragança, Antonio Carlos Camargo Carvalho, Angelo Amato de Paola, Bráulio Luna

Abstract

Studies have shown the impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) on the patients' quality of life. Specific questionnaires enable the evaluation of relevant events. We previously developed a questionnaire to assess the quality of life of patients with AF (AFQLQ version 1), which was reviewed in this study, and new domains were added. To demonstrate the reproducibility of the AFQLQ version 2 (AFQLQ v.2), which included the domains of fatigue, illness perception and well-being. We applied 160 questionnaires (AFQLQ v.2 and SF-36) to 40 patients, at baseline and 15 days after, to measure inter- and intraobserver reproducibility. The analysis of quality of life stability was determined by test-retest, applying the Bartko intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha test. The total score of the test-retest (n = 40) had an ICC of 0.98 in the AFQLQ v.2, and of 0.94 in the SF36. In assessing the intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the AFQLQ v.2, the ICC reliability was 0.98 and 0.97, respectively. The internal consistency had a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.82, compatible with good agreement of the AFQLQ v.2. The AFQLQ v.2 performed better than its previous version. Similarly, the domains added contributed to make it more comprehensive and robust to assess the quality of life of patients with AF.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 11%
Unknown 16 89%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 16 89%